| StockFetcher Forums · General Discussion · IF? | << >>Post Follow-up |
| volvlov 32 posts msg #148919 - Ignore volvlov |
8/15/2019 10:40:07 PM I don't understand SF's rationale for not having Boolean operations. I thought I would throw this question out in case there is a work around. Is this expression possible in SF? If close is greater than open, cp =1, else cp=0 |
| KSK8 561 posts msg #148920 - Ignore KSK8 |
8/16/2019 8:18:17 AM https://forums.stockfetcher.com/sfforums/?q=view&tid=28017&start=0 |
| four 5,087 posts msg #148923 - Ignore four modified |
8/16/2019 10:33:30 AM Examples FALSE  TRUE  |
| volvlov 32 posts msg #148932 - Ignore volvlov |
8/16/2019 10:54:40 PM Perfect! Thank you two for the help. |
| four 5,087 posts msg #148936 - Ignore four |
8/17/2019 1:28:28 PM volvlov, welcome |
| dr 1 posts msg #148981 - Ignore dr |
8/23/2019 12:29:57 AM StockFetcher is very easy for me, indeed "user friendly," after a long time going through the Usage Guide online. For me, needing to use Booleans or other quasi-programming, which I learned about decades ago, would be an entirely new adventure. I do agree that many people are at that level and it might improve their investing and trading results. Other paid screeners might require some of these complicated equations, but StockFetcher is my choice. I would prefer to devote more effort to learning about the stock market. |
| StockFetcher Forums · General Discussion · IF? | << >>Post Follow-up |