glgene
616 posts
msg #72902
- Ignore glgene |
3/18/2009 6:57:07 PM
Chetron,
Sorry, but there must be something slightly wrong with your latest scripting on doing a 13-day EMA of price, and then smoothing that with ROC(21). Why do I say that?
XLF went up 10.06% today. Broke above its 50-day MA, saw its RSI(14) go from 55.79 yesterday to 62.54 today, and saw its xroc go from 11.49 yesterday to 50.98 today.
Yet, it still doesn't hit your 100 line. It's at 99.88
??????
Zack
|
chetron
2,817 posts
msg #72903
- Ignore chetron |
3/18/2009 7:40:02 PM
= )
|
glgene
616 posts
msg #72904
- Ignore glgene |
3/18/2009 7:43:03 PM
=) ??
Maybe 100 is a sell instead of a buy? If 100 is a sell, then what is a buy?
?????
|
chetron
2,817 posts
msg #72915
- Ignore chetron |
3/19/2009 7:09:18 AM
I WAS THINKING MORE THIS....
|
glgene
616 posts
msg #72947
- Ignore glgene |
3/19/2009 7:06:53 PM
Chetron,
Your latest idea may have merit, but as you said a few messages back, there is no consistency with any number that may fire as the appropriate buy/sell signals. Have you since come up with any numbers?
In the meantime, do you see any possibility of finishing the task of creating a smoothed ROC (as decribed before; 2 steps)? That would be preferable to me, since that idea came from the book mentioned -- saying it would provide better returns than simply using the "xroc" crossover as the buy/sell signal.
I welcome your input and scripting -- past, present, and future!
Zack
|
chetron
2,817 posts
msg #72952
- Ignore chetron |
3/19/2009 9:42:25 PM
i'm tapped......
|
glgene
616 posts
msg #72954
- Ignore glgene |
3/19/2009 10:54:10 PM
Thanks, again, Chetron
Your help with my progress has been invaluable. Without your assistance, I would have gotten nowhere.
I'll keep plugging away at it. I'll share my final idea with you. It will probably be ROC (of some kind) coordinated with a secondary signal. Just got to figure out the best one for me that makes sense.
How did you become so proficient with SF scripting? I've seen your work elsewhere on this msg. system. You're GOOD!
Zack
|
chetron
2,817 posts
msg #72960
- Ignore chetron |
3/20/2009 6:53:46 AM
FROM READING ALL TRO'S AND MANY OTHERS FOLKS THAT HAVE BEEN CODING.
|
chetron
2,817 posts
msg #73216
- Ignore chetron
modified |
4/2/2009 6:48:18 AM
MAYBE....
OR...............
|
chetron
2,817 posts
msg #79532
- Ignore chetron |
9/17/2009 8:06:32 PM
EMAN, YOU LOOKING FOR THIS?
|