TheRumpledOne 6,411 posts msg #57521 - Ignore TheRumpledOne modified |
12/4/2007 12:33:20 PM
Experiment with different percent line crossings... you may just find a "sweet spot".
|
TheRumpledOne 6,411 posts msg #57523 - Ignore TheRumpledOne modified |
12/4/2007 12:56:24 PM
Using the concept of market profile on a daily chart.
|
TheRumpledOne 6,411 posts msg #57670 - Ignore TheRumpledOne |
12/6/2007 1:17:41 AM
|
TheRumpledOne 6,411 posts msg #57774 - Ignore TheRumpledOne |
12/8/2007 2:52:20 PM
Looks like no one liked these...
Win some, lose some.
|
absorrel4 10 posts msg #88936 - Ignore absorrel4 |
3/1/2010 8:36:38 PM
TRO....wonder if you (or others) could help. I use Market Profile and I use the "edges" of price clusters as key reference points for my trade decisions. As I am sure you know, the clusters where there is the most price action can be anywhere within the previous year's range....near the top of the range, in the middle or at the bottom (or anywhere inbetween). I viewed your filter and I like how I can use the approach to get a count of where the stock traded over the last year (which will show me the general area of the price "clusters"). I am wondering how to take this to the next level. I would like to create a filter to show the area where the most repetitive trades occurred thoughout the year (for example, if the most action took place in the 10%, 20%, and 30% levels per your original filter)....I would then like the filter to tell me which stocks are just now breaking out of this this critical region/cluster. Any ideas? Thanks in advance!
|
TheRumpledOne 6,411 posts msg #89051 - Ignore TheRumpledOne |
3/4/2010 9:04:43 AM
You would count the days price was at each level and display the results. See my RUN FOREST, RUN filter for an example of how to do that.
|
absorrel4 10 posts msg #89078 - Ignore absorrel4 |
3/4/2010 1:58:14 PM
Thanks....
|
mhome 12 posts msg #104196 - Ignore mhome |
1/3/2012 2:51:57 PM
Hi absorrel4, did you manage to get your idea working? I've been trying to construct something similar but to no avail.
|