drew9 171 posts msg #39601 - Ignore drew9 |
12/16/2005 11:05:58 AM
Wanted to thank glider for reviving this topic and BFreshour for the fine attempt at recreating the RAV Filter and also wanted to give it proper exposure on this forum. I was new when StockFetcher dropped Matthew Claassen's "canned" RAV indicator. It worked extremely well and unfortunately I never knew how many talented programmers we had on this site. BFreshour has made a first attempt at reviving this filter in in the General Discussion Forum on 12/16, but wondered if others could join in as well. The link to how RAV works is found at: http://www.shrewdinvesting.com/cat_content.asp?contentid=283&catid=136
I found the RAVM to work really well at extreme levels. I would appreciate any others that could join in on reviving this filter!
Regards,
Drew
|
BFreshour 139 posts msg #39604 - Ignore BFreshour |
12/16/2005 12:30:30 PM
I feel like I'm incredibly close at having the indicator available, however I can't figure out how to normalize the values between -50 and 50. I've tried searching the internet for formulas on normalizing a set of numbers between two values with no luck.
|
TheRumpledOne 6,411 posts msg #39607 - Ignore TheRumpledOne |
12/16/2005 3:09:47 PM
USE INDPOSITION!!
That will give you a number between 0 and 1.
Multiply by 100.
Then subtract 50.
And you will have values between -50 and + 50.
MAY ALL YOUR FILLS BE COMPLETE.
|
BFreshour 139 posts msg #39609 - Ignore BFreshour |
12/16/2005 3:31:51 PM
Thanks TRO. Indposition returns values between 0 and 1, so I just subtracted .50.
|
BFreshour 139 posts msg #39610 - Ignore BFreshour |
12/16/2005 4:48:06 PM
What's the maximum amount of SET statement per filter?
|
Koronbock 201 posts msg #39612 - Ignore Koronbock |
12/17/2005 6:39:19 AM
I think it is 16.
|
TheRumpledOne 6,411 posts msg #39613 - Ignore TheRumpledOne |
12/17/2005 11:43:17 AM
LOL.. it's not 16!
It depends on the complexity.
If you don't reference a set variable in another set statement, you can have lots of set statements.
But if there is reference upon reference, your start bumping up against limits.
For example, my divergence routines can only process 4 sets of data... so I have to have 4 filters to do all the processing I want: 2,3,4,5 day positive divergence, 2,3,4,5 day negative divergence, 6,7,8,9 day positive divergence, and 6,7,8,9 day negative divergence.
HTH
|
mktmole 325 posts msg #133645 - Ignore mktmole |
1/9/2017 3:13:36 PM
Greetings of 2017. Would TRO or any other kindly update this filter to incorporate "indposition" and have it run for basic sub users?
tks kindly,
mm
------------------------------------
BFreshour, Thanks for the effort to duplicate the RAV filter.
I agree with drew9, it was one of the best around.
BFreshour **** Note: It seems like the values still need to be normalized between 2 numbers, eg 50, -50 for RAV30 and 150, -150 for RAVHJ
TheRumpledOne USE INDPOSITION!!
That will give you a number between 0 and 1.
Multiply by 100.
Then subtract 50.
And you will have values between -50 and + 50.
MAY ALL YOUR FILLS BE COMPLETE.
-----------------------------------------------------
|
SAFeTRADE 644 posts msg #133653 - Ignore SAFeTRADE |
1/9/2017 9:08:38 PM
This is only using rav30 and rav50. Might get you close to what you want.
|
mktmole 325 posts msg #133665 - Ignore mktmole |
1/10/2017 3:31:20 PM
Tks kindly SAFeTRADE !
|