shillllihs 6,044 posts msg #128772 - Ignore shillllihs |
5/26/2016 5:36:30 PM
That's better.
|
graftonian 1,089 posts msg #128773 - Ignore graftonian |
5/26/2016 5:44:28 PM
i ADDED THE EMA5 LINE TO MY FILTER AND SHORTENED THE TIME FRAME TO BETTER SEE WHAT WAS HAPPENING.
1) EMA5 CROSSES EMA13 1, SOMETIMES 2 DAYS LATER. ON THOSE DAYS (pardon my CAPS)
that it crosses on the same day it is often a big move (which I stay away from).
2) If ema5 soes not make the cross, my filter has screwed up.
Maybe a two step approach would work , with a signal, then a confirmation. The 1 or 2 day gain should be more than covered by staying out of the losers. Yesterday May 25, CRR is an example.
|
graftonian 1,089 posts msg #128792 - Ignore graftonian modified |
5/27/2016 12:02:57 PM
Seems to that the success of a position and the rate of closure of the ema13 and ema5 are correlated. I offer the following for comment:
|
Mactheriverrat 3,153 posts msg #128826 - Ignore Mactheriverrat |
5/30/2016 1:33:30 PM
|
shillllihs 6,044 posts msg #128831 - Ignore shillllihs |
5/30/2016 6:05:13 PM
Good effort focusing on Xiv Tvix Tmf. As you can see, even Tmf is capable of some serious moves.
|
Mactheriverrat 3,153 posts msg #128839 - Ignore Mactheriverrat |
5/31/2016 9:58:25 AM
2nd day MA(4) up
NADL
|