tennisplayer2 210 posts msg #124473 - Ignore tennisplayer2 modified |
7/21/2015 11:47:51 PM
I can't seem to be able to open the file, but I do like Tactical Asset Allocation. I also know the Kevin backtests extensively before he posts. Toad, I hope that you are incorrect. Thanks for you input.
|
Toad 20 posts msg #124477 - Ignore Toad |
7/22/2015 9:01:04 AM
Tennisplayer (I am also a tennisplayer yay :P). Did you try downloading the file and opening it or just try to let it open in the browser. It is a large file (~10 MB) since it has a lot of raw data in it so it probably won't open in the browser. What version of excel do you have? I will save it down to 2003 format and reupload it tonight...maybe that is the problem.
|
tennisplayer2 210 posts msg #124480 - Ignore tennisplayer2 |
7/22/2015 10:02:02 AM
Toad, glad to hear that you are also a tennisplayer. I was able to download it and then open it. Lots of data to analysis. I am surprise that the returns are not that impressive. I hope that Kevin will chime in. Thanks.
|
Toad 20 posts msg #124484 - Ignore Toad |
7/22/2015 8:03:58 PM
Good that you were able to open it...just tried to save it down and it looks like I used a formula function throughout =index(match()) that was not available in the older versions...short story is I can't really save it down and keep the formulas intact. I may look through this again this weekend since I do need a good 401k management strategy, but I really do not think I have made an error in my backtesting.
|
Kevin_in_GA 4,599 posts msg #124485 - Ignore Kevin_in_GA |
7/22/2015 9:49:09 PM
Toad: not really sure how you are backtesting this - I simply use the end of each month and make a re-allocation at the open of the next trading day. Here are the StrataSearch backtest results for the same period as you have backtested:
EQUITY CURVE:
STATS:
The more simplistic SPY-AGG system gives basically the same results:
EQUITY CURVE:
STATS:
This is consistent with what I have been seeing - it beats the market with lower drawdown and consequently a higher Sharpe ratio. Trade it or not as you see fit.
|
Toad 20 posts msg #124487 - Ignore Toad |
7/23/2015 12:02:03 AM
It is probably me trying to over-complicate my spreadsheet...I will look into my sheet this weekend. Thanks for providing me with the stratasearch graph for the period I used...should be helpful to find where I am going wrong.
|
mahkoh 1,065 posts msg #124488 - Ignore mahkoh |
7/23/2015 6:54:44 AM
Toad,
One thing that seriously affects your results is using non adjusted close prices. You should check the results when using adjusted prices as Stratasearch does.
|
Toad 20 posts msg #124489 - Ignore Toad |
7/23/2015 8:33:56 AM
I will look at that mahkoh, thanks. I have been using non-adjusted close prices, but can swich them for the adjusted easily. I would imagine that does make a difference especially with AGG.
|
mahkoh 1,065 posts msg #124496 - Ignore mahkoh |
7/23/2015 5:38:41 PM
Examining the equity curves above I notice that holding SPY actually outperforms the system until mid 2007. And note that buy and hold nearly doubles after touching breakeven in late 2011 while rotating adds some 50 % during the same period. It would seem the system mainly has an edge during times of market turmoil.
|
Kevin_in_GA 4,599 posts msg #124500 - Ignore Kevin_in_GA |
7/23/2015 10:07:53 PM
Mahkoh - basically you are correct, but it really has to do with avoiding large drawdowns. The system may not beat SPY every year, but it seems to beat it over a longer timeframe, which is why this is an INVESTMENT strategy rather than a trading strategy.
|