dangreene
229 posts
msg #153275
- Ignore dangreene |
7/23/2020 6:49:12 PM
roca,
|
roca1018
163 posts
msg #153277
- Ignore roca1018 |
7/24/2020 6:35:02 AM
dangreene,
Thanks for the modified filter. Its there a way to whittle it down as I got over 7000 results from
yesterday's close.
Thanks again
Rich
|
graftonian
1,089 posts
msg #153278
- Ignore graftonian |
7/24/2020 8:52:48 AM
@Rich, I only have the $8.95 subsription, don't know what the problem is. Nibor(I think) once mentioned removing empty lines and comments.
Good luck and good hunting,
Graf
|
graftonian
1,089 posts
msg #153279
- Ignore graftonian
modified |
7/24/2020 9:13:33 AM
Trade 1 Jul22 MWK $6.52 7/22 $6.83(4.75%) 7/23 $7.10(8.9%)
Trade 2 Jul23 CDTX $4.10 7/23 $4.09(-0.2%)
Trade 3 Jul24 EXPI $20.89
EXPI looking a bit shakey in pre-mkt, I think $20 is a better price.
Maybe a small wager on NEPT @ $3.08?
|
dangreene
229 posts
msg #153280
- Ignore dangreene |
7/24/2020 10:36:56 AM
roca,
Thanks for the modified filter. Its there a way to whittle it down as I got over 7000 results from
yesterday's close.
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
Yes, add your own preference for volume and price limits.
|
graftonian
1,089 posts
msg #153281
- Ignore graftonian |
7/24/2020 10:45:37 AM
I have found an error in the calculation of H10
The line:
set{var10, cema(var9, 7)}
should be
set{var10, cema(var9, 3)}
the nearest Sq.root of the period
Graf
|
graftonian
1,089 posts
msg #153286
- Ignore graftonian
modified |
7/25/2020 8:26:44 AM
Trade 1 Jul22 MWK $6.52 7/22 $6.83(4.75%) 7/23 $7.10(8.9%) 7/24 $7.59(16.4%)
Trade 2 Jul23 CDTX $4.10 7/23 $4.09(-0.2%) $3.85(-6.1%)
Trade 3 Jul24 EXPI $20.89 No Buy
Not a great week, but any win is OK. Watching Monday morning GSAT
|
nibor100
1,031 posts
msg #153290
- Ignore nibor100 |
7/26/2020 8:51:16 AM
@roca1018,
Besides the Hull 10/50 moving avg crosses and Graf's accompanying Hull based filtering criteria, Graf has included the Schaff Trend Cycle indicator in his first filter in this thread for charting purposes.
Though Graf is not using the Schaff Trend Cycle code to filter with, since by itself it normally requires the SF advanced subcription to run, you'll need to delete the Schaff Trend Cycle code in order to run this Hull filter version, on a regular SF subscription.
Note that at the end of the Schaff Trend Cycle portion of the code is one of his Hull filtering criteria lines
"2 day slope of H50 > 0" so you probably don't want to delete that line.
Ed S.
|
nibor100
1,031 posts
msg #153291
- Ignore nibor100 |
7/26/2020 8:58:09 AM
@Graf,
I agree that your Hull 10 period moving avg calculation is off a little but the line of code in your filter that needs to be changed is the following
set{H10, cwma(valslowA, 7)}
not this one
set{var10, cema(var9, 3)}
as that 2nd line is from the Schaff Trend Cycle portion of your filter.
I believe replacing the 7 with a 3 in that 1st line, will make the Hull 10 period calc more accurate.
Ed S.
|
graftonian
1,089 posts
msg #153295
- Ignore graftonian |
7/26/2020 10:49:20 AM
Ed, you are aboluterly correct. The line that needed correction was the 5th line of the H10 script.
I must have pulled "var10" out of my a**.
|