tomm1111 202 posts msg #69134 - Ignore tomm1111 modified |
11/9/2008 11:47:09 PM
This filter calculates the CCI Stochastic. As written, it is based on a CCI(14) with a 5 day look back period and 3 day exponential moving average smoothing. Change to fit.
Go LONG as the cci_sto crosses above 20 and go SHORT as it crosses below 80.
|
chetron 2,817 posts msg #69136 - Ignore chetron modified |
11/10/2008 6:52:14 AM
THANX TOMM
MAYBE A CCI BILLY ALSO.....
|
chetron 2,817 posts msg #69138 - Ignore chetron modified |
11/10/2008 9:14:36 AM
maybe.....
|
tomm1111 202 posts msg #69159 - Ignore tomm1111 modified |
11/10/2008 7:17:00 PM
Well, perhaps in my haste, I left out the cci part of the original filter. I updated the original post. The filter below includes the billy(2) work that Chetron put together (thanks Chetron!). I increased the cci-sto is based on cci(14) with a look back period of 5 days and then a 3 day exponential average smoothing. The billy(2) also has a a 3 day exponential average smoothing. This increases the lag, but reduces some of the whipsaws.
Current you cannot sort by cci_sto column. I believe this is due to a divide by zero issue. I will take a look at this later today.
|
chetron 2,817 posts msg #69161 - Ignore chetron |
11/10/2008 9:04:35 PM
sorry tomm, i should have paid better attention.
updated my filters to be cci indicators also.
billy calc should be with cci also.
|
tomm1111 202 posts msg #69163 - Ignore tomm1111 |
11/10/2008 9:29:51 PM
Yeah right Chetron. I haven't thought of calculating cci using the billy calc.
I can't figure out why "nan" shows up in the cci_sto and cci_billy columns. I believe this is what makes them unsortable. I experimented with eliminating any potential divides by zero but still getting the "nan"s. Any idea's.
|
chetron 2,817 posts msg #69164 - Ignore chetron modified |
11/10/2008 9:35:01 PM
i sorted my last filter by filtering out the nan with "cci_sto above -0"
but of course i don't get the nans
also you don't need the value variable just put "cci(14)" straight up.
|
chetron 2,817 posts msg #69165 - Ignore chetron modified |
11/10/2008 9:46:56 PM
and of course....
|
tomm1111 202 posts msg #69169 - Ignore tomm1111 |
11/11/2008 1:21:23 AM
Chetron, thx for the help on this and the "nan" removal. It looks good.
|
four 5,087 posts msg #143977 - Ignore four |
7/1/2018 2:06:44 AM
pop
|